.

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Self Assessment

Whether it Is in regards to family, friends or co-workers we constantly do self assessments. Self-assessment Is specify as a extremity through which collapses gain knowledge some themselves. This includes information ab come out their likes and dislikes as well as their reactions to specific situations. By knowing more about themselves, individuals can be compe disco biscuitt to come across the work situations and occupations that are most(prenominal) appropriate for them. There are some(prenominal) lessons that can be learnt from self-assessment in relation to individual finis make.This interrogation paper ordain examine reveal the lesions learned from self assessment. We result observe of the Influence of the American College of health care Executives ( pine away) as a guide force In setting good standards in the health care industry. This will lead us to discuss how our individual ethics tempt our close do. Lastly, a formulated system on enhancing in store(pr edicate) decision-making will be explained. Self-assessments of an individuals abilities drive proved to play a fundamental usage in career-based decision making. Self-assessments also serve as a deep-seated discipline source which provides a basis for decision-making.A good example Is the Jungian re rigation Self-Assessment which was developed from the theories of personality types by Carl Jung (Sedgwick, 2008). This type of self-assessment was initially created with the aim of constituent women in the course of the Second World War in lay out to give them a chance to enter the workforce. There was a attach success in the Jungian Personality Self- Assessment which was eventually promulgated in the year 1962 (Junker, 2005). Self- assessments enable participants to have knowledge of their personality types.This In turn helps Individuals to determine whether they cult in specific relationships, Jobs, learning styles, educational pursuits and means of personal growth. The Wester n Nevada College noted that self-assessments are not utilize to de delightful an individual but they enable concourse to figure out various types of personalities and their implications. Individuals with different personality types naturally pursue varying perspectives, interest, motivations and behaviors. awareness of personality types enables people o comprehend and value other people who act and think differently.Hence, awareness about ones personality type Is the most crucial step towards Individual decision making process (Junker, 2005). In knowing ones personality it can shape ones views on ethical decision making, especially in the realm of healthcare management. Healthcare managers often cheek situations that are ethically complex for instance, determination of accountability for medical errors. Healthcare associations and I organizations strive to fit dignity, maintain ethical standards ND ensure superior-quality of care deep down the profession of medicine.However, I t can be extremely gainsay to uphold the aforementioned standards in practice due to the complex disposition of situations confronting healthcare managers (Morrison, 2009). The American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) Code of ethics is maintained by the organization. The code of ethics is responsible for setting standards of ethical behavior pertaining to healthcare professions In their association with patients. ACHE standards give a gulled as to how health care professionals need to perform tenet professional activities.According to ACHE fix AT ethics, healthcare professionals should practice with integrity, honesty, fairness, respect and good faith (Morrison, 2009). ACHE standards play a fundamental role of promoting managerial ethics in spite of appearance the healthcare profession, which is the key to ethical decision-making. According to a report by an American Medical Association, placing more structures on ethical-decision making helps in up managerial ethics with in the healthcare profession. Hence, ACHE standards enhance the focussing on goals and structures within the healthcare organization.Consequently, this ensures increased ethical accountability on the healthcare professionals resulting in enhanced ethical decision making process (Morrison, 2009). Hence, it clear that the ACHE standards provide a comprehensive ethical snap for health service professionals. Despite the beneficial effects of the standards, a staring(a) analysis of the ACHE code was done. It points out the fact that it fails to sufficiently talking to various ethical issues pertaining to managed care. This forces us to probe our personal ethics at a deeper level.Individual ethics refer to the ability to differentiate hat is regenerate from what is wrong. This may entail personal values, norms and beliefs. The influence of individual beliefs and values as well as the values of the coworkers has a peachy impact on an individuals decision making (Farrell, Frederica an d Farrell, 2006). While some organizations encourage their employees to come up with ethical choices, other organizations lead to promotion of immoral conduct within their employees. There is an assumption that many people make choices which are grounded on their personal values and beliefs.According to social scientists, there re various factors that influence ethical decision making, and individual factors are among the significant factors to consider. One of the great challenges encountered in relation to organizational ethics is that of individual ethical values. Individual factors are prerequisite in the resolution of ethical issues of concern. Disputes between coworkers usually emerge in an organization or workplace, and decisions made in revision to resolve the conflicts are based on the conflicting parties moral philosophies and beliefs.The enormousness of ethical issues reflects the feelings of an individual once initiating the process of ethical decision making (Farrel l, et al. , 2006). It is therefore clear that an individuals beliefs and values play a crucial role in ethical decision making. However, it is noteworthy that individuals decisions are dependent on an organizations ethical climate, culture and pressure from supervisors and coworkers. Every organization has its own ethical climate that has a significant impact on its employees decision making process (Farrell, et al. , 2006). -But a focus should be placed on enhancing future decisions.Many important outcomes of families, individuals, societies, organizations and governments are shaped by the various decisions made. It is therefore immanent to formulate appropriate strategies to remedy decision making in the future. due(p) to the massive costs that may be caused by illogical and spoilt decision making, it is vital to lay great emphasis and effort in coming up with strategies that can improve the act of decision making (Feldman, 2002). One effective strategy that can be used to imp rove decision making is optimizing. Through optimizing, an individual is able to choose the crush possible answer to a given issue.It is first of all essential to determine a list of alternatives from which one can be able to choose the most suitable solution or alternative to adopt I en timorousness AT optimizing strategy apneas AT ten cost Involved Walt alternative solutions, importance of the problem, individual values, time availableness and availability of knowledge and resources (Feldman, 2002). Organizations can employ a motivation strategy in order to improve decision making process in the future. Through motivation, people can gain self-confidence and get to moot in homeless.One of the important aspects to making logical decisions is having a belief in oneself. People who are confident have a high fortune of making appropriate decisions. Hence, it is essential for organizations to have influential leaders who have the ability to motivate the employees they manage (Feldm an, 2002). At some point in our life we, voluntary or involuntary, take a self-assessment. It is from this that we learn who we rattling are. A method such as the Jungian Personality Self-Assessment introduced by Carl Jung is an excellent assessment to probe who we really are.It could be argued that a fine line exists between knowing who you are and the ethics that guide us. For those individuals in healthcare, when walking that fine line having the code of ethics as put forth by the ACHE to guide ones decision-making aids to reduce to interpellation of personal feelings when professional decisions are made. To ensure this, imploring the process of optimization to arrive at the best conclusion has yielded successful results. The ability to separate personal from professional is very important and self-assessments can aid in that procedure. References Feldman, D. A. (2002).Self assessment

No comments:

Post a Comment