Lincoln vs. Davis Essay

Davis vs. capital of Nebraska The manage custodyt styles of Jefferson Davis and Abraham capital of Nebraska greatly influenced the aftermath of the urbane War. Lincolns primary goal was to preserve the union, and in revision to do this, he made certain decisions that were un-constitutional. These decisions at long last strengthened his determination as the president as the war progressed. He flush state in his address that if necessary, he would do whatever it takes to net. Jefferson, in contrast, present a very loose ruling all over the people of the confederacy.He was transparent and followed the law without breaking rules. He allowed the war to be controlled by the array leaders who were participants in the battle, and he gave his generals trust and authority. The result of Daviiss leaders style was an executive branch weaker than Lincolns. It is debatable that because of Lincolns reckless, un-lawful decisions, the Union was able to win the war against the South. Acco rding to document A, Lincoln had a blatant disregard for the Constitution. Throughout the war, Abraham Lincoln increased the Army, dog-tired money without approval and made un-justified arrests. During his presidency he also held debate political enemies in jail without running so he could potentially gain more votes. As he delivered the Gettysburg Address, his troops guarded the canvas at a state election in Delaware, insuring a republican Victory (Document A). It is interesting to think how Lincoln is typically portrayed as Honest Abe and The Great Emancipator since he was none of these things.Jefferson Davis was the honest, law constant president that most people believe Lincoln to be. He was a very intelligent, great public speaker known for integrity. Unlike Lincoln, Davis became moderately less popular because he refused to remove un-successful officers. His support of state reign was based on deep conviction. (Document A) Davis was a very ineffective micromanager. part the battles raged on, Davis trusted his Generals to lead the war and make the decisions. Davis on the other dedicate had a calm, relaxed leadership style and welcomed the input of others.He was known to change strategies and even allowed the generals to change strategies that he had strongly opposed. Davis was able to forgive his opponents and listen to their concerns. He would consider the opinions of others and would revise his actions according to information from generals, his cabinet, or the people. One of the factors lend to the outcome of the war due to leadership styles was that Lincoln micromanaged his generals and acted as the authority, piece of music Davis allowed the generals freedom with decisions and battle strategies.Lincoln would go to any lengths to pursue his goals of preserving the Union and reproducible thousands of arrest, kept political enemies in prison without bringing charges against them, refused these hapless men right to trial by their peers, and ign ored orders from the Chief Justice of the coercive Court to release them. (Document A) Lincoln was goal oriented and focused on his plan and was not receptive to input from authorities or the people. Lincolns act of silencing his opponents led to fear in the public and ultimately to Lincoln getting his way.Because of Lincolns strong dedication to win the war, his strategy was much more powerful than Daviss. Davis ran on a trial and error style of fighting, while Lincoln would not accept failure. Because of his pains and record of winning battles, Lincoln had a strategic advantage over the Confederacy. Perhaps if Davis had a taken more responsibility and aggressiveness toward the Union, the outcome would have been different. However, because of the completely different leadership styles, the Union achieved victory over the Confederate army.